THIRST, Review – Easy Contender for Best of ’09.

Posted by Peter Hall - July 30th 2009 @ 1:30 am

Directed by Chan-wook Park, 2009
Written by Seo-Gyeong Jeong, Chan-wook Park


When I bought my wife’s engagement ring I was in over my head.  I knew nothing about rings, I knew nothing about diamonds and I knew nothing about purchasing a ring with a diamond in it.  She gave me a list of what to look for and I brought it to the first jewelry story I could find, handed it to the first person who approached me and said, “This is what I want”.  What followed was a lot of talk about clarity and color and weight and the things rabbits eat and I remained just as clueless when I handed over my credit card as when I walked in the door.  It’s not that I didn’t care about the details of the biggest purchase of my life, it’s just that the details were outside me.  All I cared about was the milestone it represented.

THIRST is the kind of film I don’t want to say anything about.  I just want to point it out, say, “Yep, this is the one”, and move on until more people have an opportunity to see it.  It’s the first time all year long at a theater that I’ve felt at the mercy of a filmmaker.  It’s the first time in ’09 I’ve felt unequivocally that what I’m watching is a film without peer, which is saying a lot considering how much in love I am with WATCHMEN, THE HURT LOCKER and MOON.  THIRST writhes with a seductive, marvelous sense of discovery that I could only spoil by talking about.  Which is giving me blue balls, because the more I think about it, the more I just want to talk about Chan-wook Park’s best film to date.

I won’t spoil anything beyond what the trailer makes obvious: Kang-ho Song plays a priest who receives a blood transfusion that turns him into a vampire.  Done.  That’s all you’re getting out of me plot wise.  Anyone who dives beyond that is a dick.  I will, however, talk about why I think it’s one of the best films of the year, despite having imperfections at its core.  It’s a flawed masterpiece, not unlike the aforementioned diamond.  It communicates a world to the naked eye, a world that looks perfect, but when the trained eye dives down to a molecular level structural inconsistencies appear.  But who cares?  It’s not about the guts, it’s about what it represents.  This is the one, after all.  You know it just looking at it.  THIRST is a gem to behold, molecular level be damned.

The easiest way to describe something as complex as THIRST would be to call it the Anti-TWILIGHT vampire movie.  It’s lethal, highly erotic, romantic in its savagery, lustful, difficult, and, best of all, totally uninhibited.  Chan-wook Park is not out to split the notion of the vampire into good and evil, as so many films with this dynamic do, and he is certainly not concerned with making any of his characters enviable.  His goal is to show how unrestrained a detached soul can be.  Simple as that.  Vampirism is a catalyst for examining faith.  Faith in the Lord, Faith in Marriage, Faith in Humanity.  All three are layered insecurities spread throughout Park and Jeong’s script.  It’s fascinating to watch how seamless the transition can be from devotion to absolute corruption.

Oh, and it’s also ostensibly the most disturbing Korean movie I’ve ever seen.  Which is great, because those brutal interludes are made all the more powerful by a script that isn’t just consistently funny, but is often times downright hilarious.  In that respect this is Park’s most Western movie yet.  Korean cinema has an odd sense of humor, one that either falls in line with cultural norms lost in translation or with a slapstick comedy off-breed that went out of style in America long ago.  Take, for example, star Kang-ho Song’s two best films (not counting THIRST), MEMORIES OF MURDER and THE HOST.  Dark moments are punctuated by comedic gags, be they the cops you’re not sure you’re supposed to take seriously in MEMORIES or the falling-on-their-ass moments of THE HOST.  Yes, the cultural nuance that makes THIRST a distinctly Korean movie is still there, but much of the film’s dialog is far closer to a witty exchange in, say, a Woody Allen film than the bumbling, falling down antics found in most Korean exports.

Which brings me to my only problem with the film.  There is a tonal shift in the middle of THIRST that seems completely out of place, taking it from grounded to lofty in a single scene.  I understand its inclusion at a point in the film that requires a release of the guilt that’s been building around all the actions leading up to said scene, but the pressure difference is so drastic it completely divorces you from the film.  It’s the only batch of levity in the film that’s so absurd its farsical.  You’re no longer submerged in the world of the characters, you’re yanked back out into your auditorium seat by a film that has suddenly decided to literally show what its characters are thinking.  It is the visual equivalent of Woody Allen subtitling speech vs thoughts in ANNIE HALL.  It’s a wild sequence and it’s humorous, but it doesn’t fit.  And yes, I realize a paragraph ago I was favorably comparing THIRST to the sharp writing of Allen, but it’s not necessary to be so damned literal about it.

Not in a movie that ends up feeling longer than it needs to be, that is.  That sequence, which is maybe 15-20 minutes long, could have been excised wholesale and the movie would be better off for it.  It’s telling of how talented of a director Chan-wook Park is that the remainder of the movie recovers from that distraction, but when you walk out of the theater, you’re still walking out 20 minutes later than you could have – and should have.

But that’s okay, because I’m sure that glaring wrinkle will iron out with repeat viewings.  Plus, taken as a whole THIRST is just magnificent.  It’s a 2009 vampire tale that feels like an old school man-becomes-monster movie.  It’s funny, startling and has a never ending spirit of adventure to all its dark misery.  I know I recently called THE COLLECTOR the best American horror movie so far this year and I still stand by that because, well, its domestic competition is comprised of two Platinum Dunes, 3-D camp and one generic ass PG-13 ghost movie.  But THIRST is flat out one of the best movies I’ve seen of any genre this year.  That it’s a horror movie is icing on the crimson cake.  Can’t wait to see it again.

Tags: , , ,


rss 22 comments
  1. adam charles
    July 30th, 2009 | 11:20 am | #1

    This is, so far, my favorite review I’ve read of yours. I’m not quite sure I consider this film better than OLDBOY, but the fact that I’m contemplating it is about as high a praise as I can give to most films. It’s definitely Park’s most dense film, at least that I’ve seen; which includes his revenge trilogy and his segment of 3 Extremes.

  2. July 30th, 2009 | 1:56 pm | #2

    Thanks man, this was one of the few times I’ve felt I’m good at what I do.

  3. Dave
    July 30th, 2009 | 2:04 pm | #3

    Peter, you should rest easy knowing you are definitely good at what you do. Of all the horror blogs I have read and continue to read, yours is by far my favorite due not only to the content but to your writing skill. You have a real knack for prose, as well as for reviewing movies.

  4. July 30th, 2009 | 2:05 pm | #4

    Well damn, thanks again, Dave. I really do appreciate it.

  5. adam charles
    July 30th, 2009 | 2:07 pm | #5

    What do you do Peter?

  6. July 30th, 2009 | 2:12 pm | #6

    Rant and Rave on Joe Schmoe’s Horror Blog?

  7. adam charles
    July 30th, 2009 | 2:48 pm | #7

    Oh. Well, you’re okay at that. You’re a pretty good writer though. You should do that instead.

  8. Barry
    July 30th, 2009 | 5:27 pm | #8

    I am now frantically searching for a way to see this. Thanks for not spoiling anything.

  9. July 30th, 2009 | 10:38 pm | #9

    Barry, here’s the first round of announced theaters/dates. Hopefully it’s not too far from you: http://filminfocus.com/focusfeatures/film/thirst/theatres

  10. August 3rd, 2009 | 12:25 pm | #10

    I am so impressed I had to save it so I continously go back and read things I may have skimmed

  11. patrick
    August 6th, 2009 | 8:11 pm | #11

    I couldn’t agree more with everything you’ve written here. We even share the same problem with the film but where you were able to forgive the length and tone shift, I found it a little too hard to swallow. I guess I was also annoyed by the audience I watched this movie with. I saw the humor in the movie and what I loved most about it was how it thinly vailed some really tragic stuff because although this was not your typical vampire movie, some things never change: the vampire is a sad, tragic character. The audience I saw it may as well have been listening to dick and ball jokes. Oh, this is my first comment but I’ve been a reader for a long time. Love this blog so much.

  12. August 7th, 2009 | 1:54 pm | #12

    Thanks, Patrick. :D

  13. October 4th, 2009 | 10:44 am | #13

    Where can someone buy the movie:malibu shark attack(2009) at ?I can’t find it any where.

  14. October 4th, 2009 | 10:59 am | #14

    full screen as well as full screen movie:slaughter(2009),please help me find out the place/s !.Thank you four your time.Bye.

  15. December 14th, 2009 | 3:52 pm | #15

    Excellent review! I love Chan wook-Park’s work and he just keeps getting better and better. This is a beautiful film in many ways which is awkward to say considering the subject matter. It is the most inventive vampire movie I’ve seen in a long time. Plus, I always appreciate that Chan infuses philosophical dilemmas into his films as well.

  16. January 26th, 2011 | 7:48 am | #16

    I have desired to post about something similar to this on a single of my blogs and this has given me an idea. I’ve really discovered a good deal studying this page. Plainly especially excellent content here.

  17. September 18th, 2011 | 2:16 pm | #17

    wunderbare bungs der beketion zu hateldeln mit arteucht und aussesch. elagerha den rasch des achfosik ohne umstertet, psydro, leewaken oder aufnalte.

  18. October 21st, 2011 | 3:31 pm | #18

    Sweet website, super design, rattling clean and utilise genial.

  19. February 23rd, 2012 | 10:24 pm | #19

    I am rather new to the blog scene and now I’m not sure which blogging system suits me best. Others have suggested me to use Joomla. Do you think Blogengine is better?

  20. February 27th, 2012 | 5:39 pm | #20

    Thanks for spending time to post this for us

  21. March 26th, 2012 | 2:01 am | #21

    Some genuinely nice and utilitarian info on this site, too I believe the style contains superb features.

  22. March 30th, 2012 | 10:31 pm | #22

    I actually wanted to write a simple word in order to thank you for these splendid concepts you are posting on this website. My particularly long internet search has at the end been compensated with awesome points to go over with my friends and classmates. I would state that that most of us site visitors are undeniably endowed to dwell in a magnificent site with many wonderful individuals with valuable concepts. I feel truly happy to have used your web page and look forward to some more entertaining times reading here. Thanks a lot again for everything.

comment on this article


Recent Comments