<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ORPHAN, Review. &#8211; Adam&#8217;s Take.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2009/orphan-review-adams-take/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2009/orphan-review-adams-take/</link>
	<description>HorrorsNotDead.com -- A Favorite Horror Movie Blog for OVER NINE THOUSAND years running.  Horror Movie Reviews and News.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:58:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Not P</title>
		<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2009/orphan-review-adams-take/comment-page-1/#comment-17221</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Not P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/?p=2767#comment-17221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adam-
No yeah I agree. It&#039;s definitely a watch once kinda deal]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam-<br />
No yeah I agree. It&#8217;s definitely a watch once kinda deal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MC</title>
		<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2009/orphan-review-adams-take/comment-page-1/#comment-17213</link>
		<dc:creator>MC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/?p=2767#comment-17213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw the twist coming - when she threatened to castrate the son, she sounded like a Russian mobster.

But that didn&#039;t prepare me for the actual reveal.

Did anyone else notice how subtly they start showing her arms, with hair on them?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the twist coming &#8211; when she threatened to castrate the son, she sounded like a Russian mobster.</p>
<p>But that didn&#8217;t prepare me for the actual reveal.</p>
<p>Did anyone else notice how subtly they start showing her arms, with hair on them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam charles</title>
		<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2009/orphan-review-adams-take/comment-page-1/#comment-17200</link>
		<dc:creator>adam charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 06:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/?p=2767#comment-17200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colin -

It is shocking when you see it. It no longer is when you know she&#039;s not.  That may just be my perception, but I react the same way even to great horror films.  Not in terms of shock but in terms of scares.  Sometimes something is portrayed as threatening, but by the time the film is done the film has convinced you that what seemed threatening in fact wasn&#039;t.  This is common in ghost story films like The Sixth Sense, The Others, and The Orphanage.  They&#039;re all relatively scary &#039;while&#039; you&#039;re watching them, but the shift towards the end of each in regards to the ghost&#039;s motives make it much less scary every repeat viewing.  They persevere and hold up to repeat viewings anyway because they are all very good films that can scare, not scary films that rely on scares to be good.

In the case of ORPHAN, to me, when you no longer view the little girl as a little girl the whole landscape changes for the worse.  The film relies heavily on your belief that she&#039;s a little girl for shock value, which I don&#039;t mind because I enjoyed it and was relatively shocked about as frequently as they intended, but when the key ingredient to the shock is replaced with its polar opposite the desired reaction won&#039;t be there a second time.

This is the biggest reason I gave the film a B minus.  I think it&#039;s enjoyable to watch once, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s nearly good enough to hold up to repeat viewings.  I know that each time I watch it will be much less enjoyable than the time before it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin -</p>
<p>It is shocking when you see it. It no longer is when you know she&#8217;s not.  That may just be my perception, but I react the same way even to great horror films.  Not in terms of shock but in terms of scares.  Sometimes something is portrayed as threatening, but by the time the film is done the film has convinced you that what seemed threatening in fact wasn&#8217;t.  This is common in ghost story films like The Sixth Sense, The Others, and The Orphanage.  They&#8217;re all relatively scary &#8216;while&#8217; you&#8217;re watching them, but the shift towards the end of each in regards to the ghost&#8217;s motives make it much less scary every repeat viewing.  They persevere and hold up to repeat viewings anyway because they are all very good films that can scare, not scary films that rely on scares to be good.</p>
<p>In the case of ORPHAN, to me, when you no longer view the little girl as a little girl the whole landscape changes for the worse.  The film relies heavily on your belief that she&#8217;s a little girl for shock value, which I don&#8217;t mind because I enjoyed it and was relatively shocked about as frequently as they intended, but when the key ingredient to the shock is replaced with its polar opposite the desired reaction won&#8217;t be there a second time.</p>
<p>This is the biggest reason I gave the film a B minus.  I think it&#8217;s enjoyable to watch once, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s nearly good enough to hold up to repeat viewings.  I know that each time I watch it will be much less enjoyable than the time before it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Not P</title>
		<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2009/orphan-review-adams-take/comment-page-1/#comment-17199</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Not P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 05:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/?p=2767#comment-17199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to disagree somewhat on that though, cause when you first see it it feels like esther&#039;s this little kid doing these horrible things.  The revelation that she&#039;s not makes the ending even creepier, while allowing the beginning 3/4 to have the shock of her being a kid.  That scene where she tries to seduce Johnneh is pretty yuck.
I don&#039;t care how drunk you are, nobody&#039;d hit that.
This movie freaked me out, but only sorta.  I was jumpy for a little afterwards but eh.
Feeling normal now, and I&#039;m a pussy when it comes to horror.
Good movie though.  Recommend it,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree somewhat on that though, cause when you first see it it feels like esther&#8217;s this little kid doing these horrible things.  The revelation that she&#8217;s not makes the ending even creepier, while allowing the beginning 3/4 to have the shock of her being a kid.  That scene where she tries to seduce Johnneh is pretty yuck.<br />
I don&#8217;t care how drunk you are, nobody&#8217;d hit that.<br />
This movie freaked me out, but only sorta.  I was jumpy for a little afterwards but eh.<br />
Feeling normal now, and I&#8217;m a pussy when it comes to horror.<br />
Good movie though.  Recommend it,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam charles</title>
		<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2009/orphan-review-adams-take/comment-page-1/#comment-17169</link>
		<dc:creator>adam charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 00:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/?p=2767#comment-17169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michele-

I was trying to avoid the *spoiler* but I guess it&#039;s gotten to be somewhat common knowledge now.  It was the fact that she turned out not to be a child.  It negates the shock of seeing a studio horror picture have the audaciousness to depict a child in that way, and as bluntly as they do.

It&#039;s similar to hearing if some of Sacha Baron Cohen&#039;s subjects were in on the joke in one of his films.  It&#039;s not shocking if the most shocking element is removed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michele-</p>
<p>I was trying to avoid the *spoiler* but I guess it&#8217;s gotten to be somewhat common knowledge now.  It was the fact that she turned out not to be a child.  It negates the shock of seeing a studio horror picture have the audaciousness to depict a child in that way, and as bluntly as they do.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s similar to hearing if some of Sacha Baron Cohen&#8217;s subjects were in on the joke in one of his films.  It&#8217;s not shocking if the most shocking element is removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2009/orphan-review-adams-take/comment-page-1/#comment-17166</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 13:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/?p=2767#comment-17166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To the reviewer -

In your opinion, the fact that she wasn&#039;t a child after all negated the terror of having her do all the terrible things? Or is it the fact that she was clinically insane and therefore we &quot;expect&quot; her to do terrible things?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the reviewer -</p>
<p>In your opinion, the fact that she wasn&#8217;t a child after all negated the terror of having her do all the terrible things? Or is it the fact that she was clinically insane and therefore we &#8220;expect&#8221; her to do terrible things?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ----</title>
		<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2009/orphan-review-adams-take/comment-page-1/#comment-17157</link>
		<dc:creator>----</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/?p=2767#comment-17157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This movie was one of the best movies I have ever seen. All of the actors and actresses in this movie did an amazing job. I thought that the little girl who played Max was adorable, I really hope she goes far in acting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This movie was one of the best movies I have ever seen. All of the actors and actresses in this movie did an amazing job. I thought that the little girl who played Max was adorable, I really hope she goes far in acting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin P.</title>
		<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2009/orphan-review-adams-take/comment-page-1/#comment-17133</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/?p=2767#comment-17133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just wanna clear something up real quick about the boycotts of this film. I saw this with my wife two days ago. We are about to adopt... and you know what? The protestors are ABSOLUTELY RIGHT! I think that we are going to see a dramatic decrease in the number of people that accidently adopt psychotic russian 32-year-olds disguised as children. Way to go special interes groups. YOU HAVE SAVED US!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanna clear something up real quick about the boycotts of this film. I saw this with my wife two days ago. We are about to adopt&#8230; and you know what? The protestors are ABSOLUTELY RIGHT! I think that we are going to see a dramatic decrease in the number of people that accidently adopt psychotic russian 32-year-olds disguised as children. Way to go special interes groups. YOU HAVE SAVED US!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
