<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: DIARY OF THE DEAD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2008/review-diary-of-the-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2008/review-diary-of-the-dead/</link>
	<description>HorrorsNotDead.com -- The next big Horror movie blog for twenty-two years running.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PT</title>
		<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2008/review-diary-of-the-dead/#comment-14348</link>
		<dc:creator>PT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 18:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/?p=553#comment-14348</guid>
		<description>Yah, good review.  I think i liked it a lot more but Romero definitely was trying too hard to make a commentary on nothing. That Crash comparison= nail + head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yah, good review.  I think i liked it a lot more but Romero definitely was trying too hard to make a commentary on nothing. That Crash comparison= nail + head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2008/review-diary-of-the-dead/#comment-14330</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/?p=553#comment-14330</guid>
		<description>Peter, now you know why my review section is collecting dust.  If I had a nickel for every half-finsihed review I've tossed because I couldn't fully get behind writing it, I'd have...  um...  Enough saved up to buy the DVD of DIARY and therefore not feel guilty if it turns out as bad as R.J. says.

Also, DAY rocks.  I keep meaning to watch it again, but can never find the time.  (Damn you, GTA!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, now you know why my review section is collecting dust.  If I had a nickel for every half-finsihed review I&#8217;ve tossed because I couldn&#8217;t fully get behind writing it, I&#8217;d have&#8230;  um&#8230;  Enough saved up to buy the DVD of DIARY and therefore not feel guilty if it turns out as bad as R.J. says.</p>
<p>Also, DAY rocks.  I keep meaning to watch it again, but can never find the time.  (Damn you, GTA!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.J. Sayer</title>
		<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2008/review-diary-of-the-dead/#comment-14329</link>
		<dc:creator>R.J. Sayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 13:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/?p=553#comment-14329</guid>
		<description>It's not a shitty review, Peter.

but i must say, you're being too kind to the ol' codger. state college? more like community college. not even film class. video production. and this ain't even the best project in the class.

my key disagreement, is i just did not find anything - apart from Samuel, who is criminally underused - about this bullshit to be entertaining. everything that i normally would've taken as brainless fun was still stained by the film's juvenile self-righteousness, and in turn, annoyed the ever-loving shit out of me.

spot on with the CRASH comparison. except for one thing: at least some of the performances in CRASH were good. whereas DIARY had some of the worst performances i've ever seen, and - again, apart from Samuel - not a saving grace among the lot. that is not hyperbole. that is the truth as i see it. especially that fuckin' professor character. jesus christ. i mean, the guy really wasn't given much other than a high-school-level satire stereotype from the script... i get that... but fuck, dude.

i too thought LAND was a dud (Land of the Dead? more like BLAND of the Dead! har! har! guffaw!). but i think DIARY makes LAND look like the fucking Renaissance.

oh, and it's always nice to see some love for DAY. that just might be one of the most unjustly derided film in history. Ever. okay... so that IS hyperbole. but seriously, that movie is amazing and fuck the haters. in the face. with Bub's zombie cock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a shitty review, Peter.</p>
<p>but i must say, you&#8217;re being too kind to the ol&#8217; codger. state college? more like community college. not even film class. video production. and this ain&#8217;t even the best project in the class.</p>
<p>my key disagreement, is i just did not find anything - apart from Samuel, who is criminally underused - about this bullshit to be entertaining. everything that i normally would&#8217;ve taken as brainless fun was still stained by the film&#8217;s juvenile self-righteousness, and in turn, annoyed the ever-loving shit out of me.</p>
<p>spot on with the CRASH comparison. except for one thing: at least some of the performances in CRASH were good. whereas DIARY had some of the worst performances i&#8217;ve ever seen, and - again, apart from Samuel - not a saving grace among the lot. that is not hyperbole. that is the truth as i see it. especially that fuckin&#8217; professor character. jesus christ. i mean, the guy really wasn&#8217;t given much other than a high-school-level satire stereotype from the script&#8230; i get that&#8230; but fuck, dude.</p>
<p>i too thought LAND was a dud (Land of the Dead? more like BLAND of the Dead! har! har! guffaw!). but i think DIARY makes LAND look like the fucking Renaissance.</p>
<p>oh, and it&#8217;s always nice to see some love for DAY. that just might be one of the most unjustly derided film in history. Ever. okay&#8230; so that IS hyperbole. but seriously, that movie is amazing and fuck the haters. in the face. with Bub&#8217;s zombie cock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2008/review-diary-of-the-dead/#comment-14328</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 13:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/?p=553#comment-14328</guid>
		<description>I like DAY.  The effects work were a huge landmark for the industry and as a story of man being its own worst enemy, I think it holds up just fine.  For the record, DAWN is my favorite.  It just has that spark in every shot.

I'm sorry for the shitty review of DIARY.  I really am.  There are times I finish writing something and hate it because it doesn't say anything (yet I publish anyway).  I hate non-committal in my own writing, but DIARY really was a pretty ambiguous picture for me.  It failed at what it was trying to capture because it tried soooo loud to do it (like CRASH), but in between my groans were chuckles and thrills.

If I had to rank it, I'd say it is better than LAND.  LAND was a real a dud, I think.  Glossy but...common.  Even still, Romero has never made an F grade picture, in my book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like DAY.  The effects work were a huge landmark for the industry and as a story of man being its own worst enemy, I think it holds up just fine.  For the record, DAWN is my favorite.  It just has that spark in every shot.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry for the shitty review of DIARY.  I really am.  There are times I finish writing something and hate it because it doesn&#8217;t say anything (yet I publish anyway).  I hate non-committal in my own writing, but DIARY really was a pretty ambiguous picture for me.  It failed at what it was trying to capture because it tried soooo loud to do it (like CRASH), but in between my groans were chuckles and thrills.</p>
<p>If I had to rank it, I&#8217;d say it is better than LAND.  LAND was a real a dud, I think.  Glossy but&#8230;common.  Even still, Romero has never made an F grade picture, in my book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2008/review-diary-of-the-dead/#comment-14327</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 13:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/?p=553#comment-14327</guid>
		<description>Since I'm seeing this movie myself one way or another, I don't know what to take from this review.  You didn't seem to care for LAND, but what does that say for DAY?  (Everyone loves NIGHT and DAWN, as well they should.)

I've found something to love in all four previous films, hopefully I'll find it here as well.  Although, I have to admit, the line comparing this film to CRASH in any way, shape or form made ME cringe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I&#8217;m seeing this movie myself one way or another, I don&#8217;t know what to take from this review.  You didn&#8217;t seem to care for LAND, but what does that say for DAY?  (Everyone loves NIGHT and DAWN, as well they should.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve found something to love in all four previous films, hopefully I&#8217;ll find it here as well.  Although, I have to admit, the line comparing this film to CRASH in any way, shape or form made ME cringe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
