<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Saw III</title>
	<atom:link href="http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2007/review-saw-iii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2007/review-saw-iii/</link>
	<description>HorrorsNotDead.com -- The next big Horror movie blog for twenty-two years running.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: R.J. Sayer</title>
		<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2007/review-saw-iii/#comment-4784</link>
		<dc:creator>R.J. Sayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 20:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2007/review-saw-iii/#comment-4784</guid>
		<description>agreed.

the only thing worthwhile to me (besides Bell and MacFayden), in this film, is the "brain surgery" scene... 

never thought a mainstream film so bland could contain something to make me cringe like that.

and yeah, at least part II had a sense of humor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed.</p>
<p>the only thing worthwhile to me (besides Bell and MacFayden), in this film, is the &#8220;brain surgery&#8221; scene&#8230; </p>
<p>never thought a mainstream film so bland could contain something to make me cringe like that.</p>
<p>and yeah, at least part II had a sense of humor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
