<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apology #&#8230;3?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2007/apology-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2007/apology-3/</link>
	<description>HorrorsNotDead.com -- The next big Horror movie blog for twenty-two years running.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2007/apology-3/#comment-6000</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2007/apology-3/#comment-6000</guid>
		<description>Well then fuck, maybe I was doing something right.

I'm too self-deprecating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well then fuck, maybe I was doing something right.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m too self-deprecating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2007/apology-3/#comment-5998</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2007/apology-3/#comment-5998</guid>
		<description>That last paragraph (about the retarded child) was hysterical. If you ask me, one of the things that sets this blog apart is crazy writing like that. One line is articulate and concise, and the next is a borderline-offensive run-on sentence smoothie of 50-cent words and rage.

When it comes to a given review, I'll generally read the whole thing, but I only repeat the sentences that seethe with anger and find new, joyfully convoluted ways to insult the movie being critiqued. Don't lose that, man. Calling bad films "cinematic abortions" and the like are what make this blog worth reading.

We know you can write. And obviously other people can, too. But not everyone can write those insane schadenfraude tirades against craptacular horror flicks.

Just my opinion, though. I'll read either way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That last paragraph (about the retarded child) was hysterical. If you ask me, one of the things that sets this blog apart is crazy writing like that. One line is articulate and concise, and the next is a borderline-offensive run-on sentence smoothie of 50-cent words and rage.</p>
<p>When it comes to a given review, I&#8217;ll generally read the whole thing, but I only repeat the sentences that seethe with anger and find new, joyfully convoluted ways to insult the movie being critiqued. Don&#8217;t lose that, man. Calling bad films &#8220;cinematic abortions&#8221; and the like are what make this blog worth reading.</p>
<p>We know you can write. And obviously other people can, too. But not everyone can write those insane schadenfraude tirades against craptacular horror flicks.</p>
<p>Just my opinion, though. I&#8217;ll read either way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
