Review: “Masters of Horror”: Pro-Life

Review: “Masters of Horror”: Pro-Life

Posted by Peter Hall - November 29th 2006 @ 12:00 am

Directed by John Carpenter, 2006
Written by Drew McWeeny, Scott Swan

Masters of Horror: Pro-Life

John Carpenter’s work on the ‘Masters of Horror" series has, from the producer and cast point of view, been applauded for his efficiency on set.  Call time is at a reasonable hour, shots are simple set ups, no late days.  After seeing his latest episode, I now understand why.

John Carpenter has gotten lazy.  And it shows.  Boy does it show.

I was really looking forward to Pro-Life.  John Carpenter, one of the true, cannonical giants of horror cinema was at the helm.  It was written by Ain’t It Cool Newsers Scott Swan and Drew McWeeny.  And Drew himself once responded directly to a comment of mine (oddly enough about this very project) on his now defunct DVD blog, and that pretty much makes us legal BFFs.

It’s about abortion, so it was bound to be a barrel of laughs.  And it had demons, so it was bound to have Prince of Darkness or Mouth of Madness inspiration.  And it had freaking Ron Perlman, so it was bound to have gruff coolness.

If only John Carpenter was bound to give a fuck.

First, he hands the music off to his son, Cody.  Second, he swaps out practical gore for CGI unnecessarily more than once.  Third, the camera work would fit perfectly on the Lifetime channel – none of that signature Carpenter epic-widescreen.  Fourth, the script should never have been approved as it was.

The music actually isn’t bad – and it was his son, so that’s cool – but comeon’ John, you’ve composed multiple, 4+ hour long Oscar ceremonies!  You can’t compose 50 minutes for your fans?    However the CGI is.  It wouldn’t be as insulting if it weren’t for the fact that we clearly see a man’s head being partially blown off only to see that same person’s body minutes later without the head wound.

The camera work, however, has no excuse.  Yes, an abortion clinic is a confined space, but that doesn’t mean it has to be so visually boring.  And most importantly, that script!  Characters repeatedly act wildly against their motivations simply to allow more screen time for further events to take place else where.  Religious nut Perlman and his boys are ready to storm an abortion clinic to get their demon impregnated kin back home.  So ready, they shoot the guard in the head and then shoot the lock off the gate.  Wielding multiple shotguns and pistols, the foursome reach the main, wooden door and decide to, "look for another way in."

Because suddenly shooting locks open is of no concern.

This continues on and off for a bit until the ep’s end.  I really dug the end, but that doesn’t change the fact that the rest of it was decent at best and just plain sloppy the rest of the time.

This is far from a return to form for John Carpenter.  Talking so poorly of his work hurts me.  It feels like I’m a little kid kicking Superman in the balls while he’s downed by that silly green rock.  I hate to not love an idol, but Pro-Life’s steadfast mediocrity just proves that if it weren’t for the mountains of gold the director had accumulated throughout his career, he’d be metaphorically plummeting in the red right now.  If it were any other director, this may pass.


rss 9 comments
  1. andy sell
    November 29th, 2006 | 1:19 pm | #1

    dammit.

    i was hoping that he would’ve learned from the mistakes he made in CIGARETTE BURNS.

    once again my expectations prove unreasonable.

    i have a new rule for Mr. Carpenter.

    NO MORE SCRIPTS BY DREW MCWEENY! HE IS NOT A SCREENWRITER! HE IS AN ONLINE REVIEWER/BLOGGER! NOT. A. SCREEN. WRITER. let him have his AICN and leave Mr. Carpenter alone.

  2. November 29th, 2006 | 3:57 pm | #2

    I heartily second that last bit. I love Drew McWeeny’s online writing style and the man has never once given me a film review/recommendation I didn’t agree with. But all the evidence he has volunteered up shows that he really shouldn’t be in the screenplay business. Not for the likes of John Carpenter, at least.

  3. andy sell
    November 30th, 2006 | 2:00 pm | #3

    yeah. i disagree with him quite a bit. but i always appreciate his style and understand his perspective. he is very good at communicating the reasoning behind his opinions. and i think he has some good ideas (the premise for CIGARETTE BURNS was great [if not entirely original] and the story for PRO-LIFE sounds pretty cool) he just doesn’t have the chops to execute them in the way they deserve. and Carpenter needs someone with serious chops. otherwise he gets lazy.

  4. andy sell
    December 13th, 2006 | 1:49 pm | #4

    just saw this recently.

    WORST EPISODE EVER.

    wasted opportunities (uhm… why didn’t the awesome-looking Demon actually do anything?!), really bad inaccuracies and inconsistencies (did they not have a legal consultant? security guard would’ve called the cops RIGHT AWAY), really atrocious dialogue vomitted up in the weakest performances ever, and pointless, pointless subplots.

    not even The Great Ron could’ve carried the weight of this bloated, dying thing. he never had a chance.

    what garbage.

    Carpenter, go home.

  5. andy sell
    December 13th, 2006 | 1:51 pm | #5

    also, i thought Argento’s new episode sucked with a capital blow.

    and Dante’s wasn’t all that much better.

  6. December 13th, 2006 | 6:10 pm | #6

    I haven’t gotten round to watching either yet, but I guess now I won’t bother rushing to do so…

    Guess I’ll just go watch more Wonderfalls! ;)

  7. andy sell
    December 14th, 2006 | 2:16 pm | #7

    Wonderfalls?

    NOOOOOooooo!

    i had a roommate once who watched that obnoxious thing non-stop.

  8. December 14th, 2006 | 5:49 pm | #8

    Sucka, please. Wonderfalls is one of the best hour long comedies network television has ever produced. You’ve no heart if you don’t like it.

  9. andy sell
    December 18th, 2006 | 12:33 pm | #9

    pffft.

    no heart?

    whatevs.

    it was a good concept and had some bright moments, but tried soooo hard at every turn to be soooo clever.

    please.

    it was dawson’s creek with a more interesting premise.

    maybe if they’d dropped all the pop-culture references and meta-as-all-hell self-awareness and amped up the characters’ sympathetic qualities a bit, i’d have liked it better.

    plus… i REALLY hated that roommate who watched it all the time.

comment on this article

Recent Blog Entries

Recent Reviews

Recent Comments
»  Matt Wells in What is Going on in This THE FINAL DESTINATION Photo?
I wanted to make a Deadpool-esque 4th wall comment but Chris beat me to it.
»  Chris in What is Going on in This THE FINAL DESTINATION Photo?
When you think about it, it was inevitable that 3-D would break down the Fourth Wall. Ba-dum-ching.
»  R.J. Sayer in Review: THE CHILDREN
you love children, Peter? someone call the authorities. hyuck. hyuck.


Categories

HND Connectivity
HND on Twitter: Ewoks vs Predator! http://bit.ly/4tezz7 2 hrs ago

RSS Feed
Add to Google
Add to Yahoo
Stumble HND
Add to Technorati Favorites


Search The Site


The League


Recommended Film Reading:  
Horror Squad  |  Twitch Film  |  Ain't It Cool News  |  Fangoria  |  Dread Central  |  Movie Forums  |  Cinematical |  24 Frames Per Second

Interesting Strangers:  
Adventures in Movie Watching  |  Kipin.net  |  Raptorcore  |  Musings Across a Continuum  |  iReel Movies


Other Horror Blogs of the LOTTD: 
Attentiondeficitdisorderly Too Flat
Billy Loves Stu
Blogue Macabre
Cinema Fromage
Cinema Suicide
Classic Horror
Day of the Woman
Dinner With Max Jenke
Drunken Severed Head
Evil on Two Legs
 
Fascination With Fear
Final Girl
Goblin Books
Good, the Bad, and Godzilla
Gospel of the Living Dead
Groovy Age of Horror
I Love Horror
Igloo of the Uncanny
Kindertrauma
Love Train for the Tenebrous Empire
Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad Movies
Moon is a Dead World
Mystery of the Haunted vampire
Reflections on Film and TV
Slasher Speak
Sweet Skulls
Theofantastique
Unspeakable Horror
The Vault of Horror
Zombos Closet of Horror
Copyright © Peter Hall. So don't even think about it.