Comments on: Review: Imprint http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-imprint/ HorrorsNotDead.com -- The next big Horror movie blog for twenty-two years running. Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:01:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: christian http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-imprint/#comment-14338 christian Wed, 21 May 2008 02:12:58 +0000 http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-imprint/#comment-14338 I thought it was 2 hours of my life Im never getting back....and what the F*** was up with Hambuger Helper in her head!!!! No, it was terrible, it can hardly be called horror, let alone disturbing! I've seen worse that was better! I thought it was 2 hours of my life Im never getting back….and what the F*** was up with Hambuger Helper in her head!!!! No, it was terrible, it can hardly be called horror, let alone disturbing! I’ve seen worse that was better!

]]> By: ‘The Dark’ (2005) | Cineblog.us http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-imprint/#comment-13165 ‘The Dark’ (2005) | Cineblog.us Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:45:42 +0000 http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-imprint/#comment-13165 [...] is this as well evidenced as by Showtime’s refusal to air Takashi Miike’s ‘Imprint‘ in their ‘Masters of Horror’ anthology. A particular form of Medical waste in [...] [...] is this as well evidenced as by Showtime’s refusal to air Takashi Miike’s ‘Imprint‘ in their ‘Masters of Horror’ anthology. A particular form of Medical waste in [...]

]]> By: Peter http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-imprint/#comment-744 Peter Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:16:30 +0000 http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-imprint/#comment-744 I think hype may have hurt you on that one. It may not make you shit your pants, but you make it sound tame - which it certainly is not. I think hype may have hurt you on that one. It may not make you shit your pants, but you make it sound tame - which it certainly is not.

]]> By: C M DREMANN http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-imprint/#comment-743 C M DREMANN Mon, 09 Oct 2006 20:29:57 +0000 http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-imprint/#comment-743 Imprint wasn't shocking and it wasn't frightening. It was boring and disappointing after all of the hype. Imprint wasn’t shocking and it wasn’t frightening. It was boring and disappointing after all of the hype.

]]> By: amphetameme.org » Blog Archive » ‘The Dark’ (2005) http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-imprint/#comment-494 amphetameme.org » Blog Archive » ‘The Dark’ (2005) Sat, 05 Aug 2006 17:01:04 +0000 http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-imprint/#comment-494 [...] But this is not to say that the modern window-dressing of J-Horror didn’t affect American cinema before ‘The Ring’ – in 2000, Robert Zemeckis’ ‘What Lies Beneath‘ name-checked numerous tropisms of the genre: Vengeful female spirits, check; supernatural posession, check and revenge. While Michelle Pfeiffer and Amber Valetta may not have had the requisite dark hair of traditional yurei, the water themes remained intact, just as they did in the John Irvin’s ‘Ghost Story‘ (1981). It is not as though J-Horror really brings anything substantially new to the blood feast. Rather, the J-Horror studios are more than willing to shatter the taboos of a typical American audience, also making conventional PG-13 ratings inappropriate. Nowhere is this as well evidenced as by Showtime’s refusal to air Takashi Miike’s ‘Imprint‘ in their ‘Masters of Horror’ anthology. A particular form of Medical waste in the river? It’s fairly obvious why Showtime didn’t want to go there. [...] [...] But this is not to say that the modern window-dressing of J-Horror didn’t affect American cinema before ‘The Ring’ – in 2000, Robert Zemeckis’ ‘What Lies Beneath‘ name-checked numerous tropisms of the genre: Vengeful female spirits, check; supernatural posession, check and revenge. While Michelle Pfeiffer and Amber Valetta may not have had the requisite dark hair of traditional yurei, the water themes remained intact, just as they did in the John Irvin’s ‘Ghost Story‘ (1981). It is not as though J-Horror really brings anything substantially new to the blood feast. Rather, the J-Horror studios are more than willing to shatter the taboos of a typical American audience, also making conventional PG-13 ratings inappropriate. Nowhere is this as well evidenced as by Showtime’s refusal to air Takashi Miike’s ‘Imprint‘ in their ‘Masters of Horror’ anthology. A particular form of Medical waste in the river? It’s fairly obvious why Showtime didn’t want to go there. [...]

]]> By: takashimiike.twoday.net http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-imprint/#comment-79 takashimiike.twoday.net Sun, 09 Apr 2006 00:37:58 +0000 http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-imprint/#comment-79 <strong>Imprint Reviews bei Kaiju Shakedown Horror's not dead...</strong> Bei Kaiju Shakedown gibt es eine Kritik zu Miikes "Masters of Horror" - Beitrag Imprint, der Ende Mai bei uns auf DVD erscheint. Eine weitere Kritik findet sich in dem Blog horrorsnotdead.com. Zur Kritik bei Kaiju Shakedown! Zur Kritik bei horrorsn... Imprint Reviews bei Kaiju Shakedown Horror’s not dead…

Bei Kaiju Shakedown gibt es eine Kritik zu Miikes “Masters of Horror” - Beitrag Imprint, der Ende Mai bei uns auf DVD erscheint. Eine weitere Kritik findet sich in dem Blog horrorsnotdead.com.

Zur Kritik bei Kaiju Shakedown!

Zur Kritik bei horrorsn…

]]>