<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Feast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-feast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-feast/</link>
	<description>HorrorsNotDead.com -- A Favorite Horror Movie Blog for OVER NINE THOUSAND years running.  Horror Movie Reviews and News.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:58:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: THE COLLECTOR, Review &#8211; American Horror Worth Championing. &#124; HorrorsNotDead.com -- A Favorite Horror Movie Blog for OVER NINE THOUSAND years running. Horror Movie Reviews and News.</title>
		<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-feast/comment-page-1/#comment-17047</link>
		<dc:creator>THE COLLECTOR, Review &#8211; American Horror Worth Championing. &#124; HorrorsNotDead.com -- A Favorite Horror Movie Blog for OVER NINE THOUSAND years running. Horror Movie Reviews and News.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-feast/#comment-17047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of person who should be cheerleading THE COLLECTOR.  I&#8217;m rather indifferent to the first FEAST, but don&#8217;t care for the sequels.  I stopped being interested in the SAW franchise after part [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of person who should be cheerleading THE COLLECTOR.  I&#8217;m rather indifferent to the first FEAST, but don&#8217;t care for the sequels.  I stopped being interested in the SAW franchise after part [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy sell</title>
		<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-feast/comment-page-1/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>andy sell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-feast/#comment-873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[interestingly enough it was the second time i saw it that was in a group setting.

the first time was totally by myself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interestingly enough it was the second time i saw it that was in a group setting.</p>
<p>the first time was totally by myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-feast/comment-page-1/#comment-840</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 15:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-feast/#comment-840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haha, just noticed it wasn&#039;t on my Blind Buy list.


Sucka!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, just noticed it wasn&#8217;t on my Blind Buy list.</p>
<p>Sucka!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-feast/comment-page-1/#comment-839</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 14:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-feast/#comment-839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just curious, did you watch it either time in a group setting?  It&#039;s clearly designed as a crowd pleaser, but for me it just didn&#039;t do much except becoming progressively more annoying.

I do think that a chunk of my distance from the set/characters had to do with watching every episode of Greenlight...it&#039;s a good thing I don&#039;t watch those online production diaries for upcoming movies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just curious, did you watch it either time in a group setting?  It&#8217;s clearly designed as a crowd pleaser, but for me it just didn&#8217;t do much except becoming progressively more annoying.</p>
<p>I do think that a chunk of my distance from the set/characters had to do with watching every episode of Greenlight&#8230;it&#8217;s a good thing I don&#8217;t watch those online production diaries for upcoming movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy sell</title>
		<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-feast/comment-page-1/#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>andy sell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-feast/#comment-786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i watched it a second time and while i wasn&#039;t nearly as impressed as i was during my maiden viewing, i still argue that the film is fun.

most of the problems you describe (aside from the infuriating action sequences, choppy editing, and bad sound design - mostly the paranoid-schizo music) i find pretty charming. 

the geography/proxemics issues make the whole thing more surreal to me. the smugness of the opening &quot;trading card&quot; subtitles and the dialogue in the beginning, to me, is about setting up expectations that the film then goes on to totally shatter. the first time i saw this, i groaned when those things came up, even though a couple lines here and there were pretty funny. i thought &quot;oh no, another oh-so-clever, oh-so-hip low budget filmmaker who thinks he&#039;s horror&#039;s next savior. spare me, dude.&quot; 

and then there&#039;s that moment. you know the one. and the cynical chip fell right off my shoulder. 

sure, alot of the dialogue throughout the film is way too self-aware. but it seemed to me that the actors knew it. or... maybe it had like a Plan 9 effect on me and I could just laugh with it. i&#039;m not entirely sure. but the few ballsy moves here and there (ie: the kid) kept me afloat. i&#039;ll totally agree that the thing has a fair share of problems. i just don&#039;t find them quite as damning as you.

a couple things should probably be mentioned though. i first saw this quite a while ago before all the fansite buzz started gushing all over itself. the only hype it had when i saw it were the project greenlight series and the fact that the weinsteins were sitting on it and nobody knew if it would ever get a release. 

also, i haven&#039;t seen a single episode of project greenlight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i watched it a second time and while i wasn&#8217;t nearly as impressed as i was during my maiden viewing, i still argue that the film is fun.</p>
<p>most of the problems you describe (aside from the infuriating action sequences, choppy editing, and bad sound design &#8211; mostly the paranoid-schizo music) i find pretty charming. </p>
<p>the geography/proxemics issues make the whole thing more surreal to me. the smugness of the opening &#8220;trading card&#8221; subtitles and the dialogue in the beginning, to me, is about setting up expectations that the film then goes on to totally shatter. the first time i saw this, i groaned when those things came up, even though a couple lines here and there were pretty funny. i thought &#8220;oh no, another oh-so-clever, oh-so-hip low budget filmmaker who thinks he&#8217;s horror&#8217;s next savior. spare me, dude.&#8221; </p>
<p>and then there&#8217;s that moment. you know the one. and the cynical chip fell right off my shoulder. </p>
<p>sure, alot of the dialogue throughout the film is way too self-aware. but it seemed to me that the actors knew it. or&#8230; maybe it had like a Plan 9 effect on me and I could just laugh with it. i&#8217;m not entirely sure. but the few ballsy moves here and there (ie: the kid) kept me afloat. i&#8217;ll totally agree that the thing has a fair share of problems. i just don&#8217;t find them quite as damning as you.</p>
<p>a couple things should probably be mentioned though. i first saw this quite a while ago before all the fansite buzz started gushing all over itself. the only hype it had when i saw it were the project greenlight series and the fact that the weinsteins were sitting on it and nobody knew if it would ever get a release. </p>
<p>also, i haven&#8217;t seen a single episode of project greenlight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ripp</title>
		<link>http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-feast/comment-page-1/#comment-785</link>
		<dc:creator>Ripp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horrorsnotdead.com/wpress/2006/review-feast/#comment-785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I finished watching it last night as well and felt the same way. You were with me when I thought about buying it and told me it was on your blind buy list. I bought it because of you and now I hate you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finished watching it last night as well and felt the same way. You were with me when I thought about buying it and told me it was on your blind buy list. I bought it because of you and now I hate you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
